I was following a car on the tollway in inclement weather when I noticed the license plate: "Mega PMS." Needless to say, I put three or four car lengths between us.
Unfortunately, that put me too far back to get a good photograph of the license plate. I wanted to prove that I saw it, because such a totalizing, charged message as a permanent fixture on a minivan seemed, to me at least, implausible.
How do people decide how they will define themselves for others? You see a similar concern occasionally bubble to the surface on reality television series: the "vamp" or the "jerk" on a living-together show like Survivor or The Real World will complain on screen or after production has closed that the camera edits portrayed only one side of them to the audience, neglecting to fully represent their wholesome, caring personality. Kara DioGuardi, the newest judge on American Idol, laid it out in Entertainment Weekly: "I know who I am, but what are people going to perceive me as? . . . They may think my intensity and my boldness are bitchy. I hope not. I don't think I'm bitchy. Do you think I'm bitchy?"
Al Hsu wrote here about different approaches to updating Facebook statuses--the virtual equivalent, perhaps, of the vanity plate. They're less static, of course: changing a Facebook status is infinitely less bureaucratic than changing a license plate, and in theory at least, the vast majority of people who see a person's Facebook status knows them enough to offer a bit of context to each passing comment, whereas you never know who's reading your license plate.
I wonder if the ambiguity I see associated with Twitter, by both users and nonusers, has something to do with the many unanswered questions surrounding self-expression: Where is the dividing line between sharing yourself and vanity? When is a detail too picayune to waste other people's time with it? When is a statement too foundational to be later supplanted? And how are you defining yourself in the process?
But I have a slightly less introspective question I'd rather submit: What would be the world's wrongest vanity plate? I think the one I saw the other day--"Mega PMS"--might come close, but I'm open to other contenders. Try to keep it clean, please: consider mine one of the outer boundaries of the contest. They don't let you put vulgarities on your license plate anyway.
Oh, and if it's your vanity plate I'm poking fun at, I'm really, really, really sorry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Both Inspiration and Cautionary Tale: Excerpts from Middling
What follows is an excerpt from the Winter 2021 edition of Middling, my quarterly newsletter on music, books, work, and getting older. I'...
-
I've recently begun reading the collected novels and short stories of Sherlock Holmes as written by Arthur Conan Doyle. I'm a trend-...
-
I've been moving slowly through How Music Works, the colossal tome by Talking Heads frontman David Byrne, over the past few months. My ...
4 comments:
We poke fun at license plates everyday. You might enjoy our blog:
http://horriblelicenseplates.blogspot.com
"MEGA PMS"? Is that the car that wrecks in the Drive's Education film, BLOOD ON THE HIGHWAY?
I had a vanity plate at one time (right out of college) that could per perceived in a slew of negative ways. The plate read:
BANDGOD
There is a story behind it - but to make a quick point, I was in the marching band in college, a friend of mine attended a band party with me and said, "everyone treats you like a god". So was born my vanity plate. I was actually surprised that it made it through the bureaucratic red tape as an acceptable (unoffensive) plate.
To the band-geeks of the world - the plate was funny. To everyone else - maybe not-so-funny. You can draw your own conclusions as to why it may not have been totally appropriate.
Given the chance again, I would have gone with my 2nd vanity choice - TPTSTUD - which just goes to show how much I thought of myself back in the day.
Is it better to lean toward sharing too much of yourself or not sharing much of yourself at all?
Post a Comment